Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Spec review for scheduler.yield() (Issue #966)

The `yield` piece of the scheduling project looks good to us, with the caveat that if the rest of the scheduling project doesn't pan out, or if the different scheduler bits end up hanging off of other objects, we'll need to come back and rename `scheduler.yield()` to avoid having it hang off of an otherwise-empty object.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/966#issuecomment-2327569837
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/966/2327569837@github.com>