Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review for CR transition of WebAssembly specifications for version 2.0 features (Issue #1002)

Hi and thank you for your response, @dschuff. We reviewed again today and we agree that making those design rationale docs more discoverable, as you suggested, would be a good idea. Other than that we are **satisfied** with the proposal. Thanks for allowing us to review.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1002#issuecomment-2446189694
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1002/2446189694@github.com>

Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2024 08:37:52 UTC