Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] View Transition Classes (Issue #938)

We looked at this again today in a breakout. While we recognize that the use case is prevalent, we still have serious concerns about the ergonomics and syntax of this solution.

We would prefer that a solution is designed that eliminates the indirection and repetition this forces authors into. For example, one potential solution could be having the UA scan for selector arguments to `::view-transition-group()` and essentially generating these rules behind the scenes. 

If an alternative design is not an option, we would strongly urge the proposers to consider framing this as a separate concept and not drawing links to classes (syntactic or conceptual), as we believe this will be confusing for authors.

We'll follow up with the CSS WG to explore these points.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/938#issuecomment-2442312817
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/938/2442312817@github.com>