Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] `getAll()` with both key and value (or index key and primary key) (#206)

Conclusions above SGTM.

> For consistency, should we add a record property to [IDBCursorWithValue](https://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/#idbcursorwithvalue)? This property could return the same type as the equivalent value in the getAllRecords() result array?

Isn't the IDBCursorWithValue already more or less the record (or a superset of the record)? We could maybe add an `asRecord()` convenience method, not sure how much demand there is though.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/206#issuecomment-2436152429
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/206/2436152429@github.com>