> We're happy to see this sort of experimentation with the FedCM problem space. It looks like there are outstanding questions in the Community Group about whether the Lightweight API will be enough to completely replace the existing proposal. We wondered whether this approach can enable single sign-_out_, and if it can't, that's a strong argument against it completely replacing the existing API. We look forward to the outcome of the testing you have planned. We are not really thinking of "lightweight FedCM" and "full FedCM" as competing proposals, but rather complementary -- different modes of using FedCM. See also https://github.com/w3c-fedid/FedCM/issues/665 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/986#issuecomment-2435734797 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/986/2435734797@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2024 16:26:06 UTC