Re: [w3c/manifest] Scope: Allow developer to have more fine-grained control of app scope. (#996)

> For compatability with different OS's (where we need to tell the OS which urls are part of the installed app and which aren't), we likely cannot use URLPattern.

I think this statement needs a bit more reasoning before we start inventing our own thing; one option would be to only allow some subset of the more generic URL pattern syntax (which is what the SW static routing API does as well, as that API does not want to allow arbitrary URLPatterns either). It is certainly possible that it doesn't make sense to describe the allowed scopes as a subset of URLPatterns, but I wouldn't dismiss URL pattern up front without first figuring out what functionality we actually want to support.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/996#issuecomment-2427341543
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/manifest/issues/996/2427341543@github.com>