Re: [whatwg/dom] `mutationObserver.disconnect({ flush: true })` (Issue #1283)

> the rest is already broken

The rest is not already broken. disconnect() was designed to stop observing anything, very explicit. No different to removeEventListener. (There might be an event queued in a task, and you won't get that event if removeEventListener is called).

If we add a dictionary to disconenct() for flush, I wonder if we want also explicit flush() which is like takeRecords() but calls the callback.



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/1283#issuecomment-2393329861
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/1283/2393329861@github.com>