- From: Dominic Farolino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:28:50 -0800
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2024 20:28:54 UTC
@domfarolino commented on this pull request.
> + <li>
+ <p>Otherwise, <a lt="try to upgrade an element">try to upgrade</a>
+ <var>inclusiveDescendant</var>.
+
+ <p class=note>If this successfully upgrades <var>inclusiveDescendant</var>, its
+ <code>connectedCallback</code> will be enqueued automatically during the
+ <a>upgrade an element</a> algorithm.
+ </li>
OK yeah I had to get educated a bit more on exactly how custom elements work and upgrade, but I agree this is not relevant for this PR. It's now removed; resolving.
> + null, null, null, <var>addedNodes</var>, <var>removedNodes</var>, <var>previousSibling</var>, and
+ <var>nextSibling</var>.
Ah yes, at some point during the mutation observer design, I did have to introduce legitimate changes to this line. Its lingering effects are an oversight. Done.
> @@ -4118,6 +4293,8 @@ interface Node : EventTarget {
[CEReactions] Node appendChild(Node node);
[CEReactions] Node replaceChild(Node node, Node child);
[CEReactions] Node removeChild(Node child);
+
Done.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1307#discussion_r1861213623
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1307/review/2465851816@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2024 20:28:54 UTC