- From: Dominic Farolino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:28:50 -0800
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2024 20:28:54 UTC
@domfarolino commented on this pull request. > + <li> + <p>Otherwise, <a lt="try to upgrade an element">try to upgrade</a> + <var>inclusiveDescendant</var>. + + <p class=note>If this successfully upgrades <var>inclusiveDescendant</var>, its + <code>connectedCallback</code> will be enqueued automatically during the + <a>upgrade an element</a> algorithm. + </li> OK yeah I had to get educated a bit more on exactly how custom elements work and upgrade, but I agree this is not relevant for this PR. It's now removed; resolving. > + null, null, null, <var>addedNodes</var>, <var>removedNodes</var>, <var>previousSibling</var>, and + <var>nextSibling</var>. Ah yes, at some point during the mutation observer design, I did have to introduce legitimate changes to this line. Its lingering effects are an oversight. Done. > @@ -4118,6 +4293,8 @@ interface Node : EventTarget { [CEReactions] Node appendChild(Node node); [CEReactions] Node replaceChild(Node node, Node child); [CEReactions] Node removeChild(Node child); + Done. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1307#discussion_r1861213623 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1307/review/2465851816@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2024 20:28:54 UTC