- From: Dan Clark <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:32:03 -0800
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1086@github.com>
Filing this issue as a central place to track open questions about [reference target](https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/reference-target-explainer.md). - [ ] https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1071 - [ ] https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1072 - [ ] An issue still needs to be filed on this, but we received feedback at [TPAC](https://github.com/w3c/tpac2024-breakouts/issues/30#issuecomment-2375176236) and from the TAG that the microsyntax proposed for phase 2 is undesirable. We should reconsider using separate attributes for each property to be redirected. Good feedback was also raised during the [TAG review](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/961). There are unresolved issues from this discussion that could be broken out into separate discussions, including: - [ ] The API name. Are there names besides `referenceTarget` we should consider? - [ ] In phase 2, how can an author indicate that references for a given property should [not be forwarded](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/961#issuecomment-2468788538)? - [ ] Depending on the outcome of https://github.com/w3ctag/gaps/issues/2, should something in addition to IDRefs be supported? For Chromium implementation TODOs, see [here](https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=id:346835896%20OR%20parentid:346835896%2B). See also https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10707. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1086 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1086@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2024 00:32:07 UTC