- From: Andrea Giammarchi <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 06:23:24 -0800
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 22 November 2024 14:23:28 UTC
@sorvell > Perhaps the behavior here can be revisited based on developer feedback from testing of initial implementations. that's a well known slippery slope ... once stuff lands as standard it's already too late to change it because at that point they will tell us "*it's too late, we have already these frameworks using this API as it is*". It happened before, it will happen again ... what I think it's missing in here, is some consistency with newly proposed APIs ... `remove`, `append`, `before`, `after` felt like fresh air and great ergonomics to deal with, we're back with "*users requested X, we're providing Y because Y is better*" ... maybe those days where everyone flocked to jQuery because everything never literally threw out of the box are forgotten and I'd rather see a state duplicated than a broken highly dynamic page in the wild, especially in these days. I guess that's just my opinion though. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/1255#issuecomment-2493879435 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/1255/2493879435@github.com>
Received on Friday, 22 November 2024 14:23:28 UTC