Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS Masonry Layout (Issue #1003)

> It was argued that the grid-integrated syntax makes it [easier to convert from grid syntax to grid-integrated masonry syntax](https://webkit.org/blog/16026/css-masonry-syntax/#simplicity-learnability), however we don't optimize for the transition period unless it's going to derail adoption.

I disagree this doesn't matter fwiw, I think it's a feature that grid-integrated masonry nicely degrades to a CSS grid. Whereas grid-independent masonry would need to duplicate the set of properties for that degradation to be possible. Graceful degradation doesn't seem mentioned in this TAG review, but I think it is an important point.



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1003#issuecomment-2490280974
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1003/2490280974@github.com>