Thank you for your time earlier in the week. As per our discussion, we are happy to see your work on phase 1 progress. It will be great to resolve this significant use case! Please let us know as and when we can provide input on phase 2. We do urge the authors to take the time to find a shorter, more broadly understandable name. We also discussed the wider, and fundamental, [issue of finding an alternative to IDREFs for expressing relationships between elements](https://github.com/w3ctag/gaps/issues/2) - we intend to explore this issue separately, and your feedback would be welcome on that thread. Should we set up a group to work on this issue, we will let you know. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/961#issuecomment-2483716803 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/961/2483716803@github.com>
Received on Monday, 18 November 2024 17:45:16 UTC