Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS :open pseudo-class (Issue #1010)

We looked at this in a breakout today and don't see any issues. Closing as satisfied.

We did note https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11039 and agree that if `:not(:open)` is equivalent to `:closed` then `:closed` isn't necessary and probably should be removed. However if it's possible that an element could be in a state that's neither open or closed, then they're not exactly equivalent and `:closed` has a purpose.

Thanks for flying TAG.


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1010#issuecomment-2471938551
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1010/2471938551@github.com>