Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Reference Target (Issue #961)

If we go with the current id-based syntax, I wonder what ergonomics improvements we could make:
- "referenceTarget" is an incredibly obscure name. We already have `delegatesFocus`. What about `delegatesReferences`, `delegatesId` or even just `delegates`?
- Do we really need two attributes? What if the attribute syntax allowed for specifying a catch-all value, a map, or both? Then a single attribute contains all the information needed to delegate references.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/961#issuecomment-2457573238
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/961/2457573238@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2024 16:01:42 UTC