- From: Alvin Ji <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 11:54:29 -0700
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/49/review/2083632278@github.com>
@alvinjiooo commented on this pull request.
> - This prevents locking upon initial navigation or re-acquiring lock
- without user's attention.
- </p>
- <p>
- A {{requestPointerLock()}} call immediately after the <a>default
- unlock gesture</a> MUST fail even when <a>transient activation</a>
- is available, to prevent malicious sites from acquiring an
- unescapable locked state through repeated lock attempts. On the
- other hand, a {{requestPointerLock()}} call immediately after a
- programmatic lock exit (through a {{Document/exitPointerLock()}}
- call) MUST succeed when <a>transient activation</a> is available,
- to enable applications to move frequently between interaction
- modes, possibly through a timer or remote network activity.
+ A [=parallel queue=] named as <dfn>lock requests queue</dfn> is
+ used for queuing all requests. When <dfn>requestPointerLock()</dfn>
+ invoked, perform the following steps:
Done
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/49#discussion_r1617758760
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/49/review/2083632278@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2024 18:54:33 UTC