- From: Alvin Ji <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 11:54:29 -0700
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/49/review/2083632278@github.com>
@alvinjiooo commented on this pull request. > - This prevents locking upon initial navigation or re-acquiring lock - without user's attention. - </p> - <p> - A {{requestPointerLock()}} call immediately after the <a>default - unlock gesture</a> MUST fail even when <a>transient activation</a> - is available, to prevent malicious sites from acquiring an - unescapable locked state through repeated lock attempts. On the - other hand, a {{requestPointerLock()}} call immediately after a - programmatic lock exit (through a {{Document/exitPointerLock()}} - call) MUST succeed when <a>transient activation</a> is available, - to enable applications to move frequently between interaction - modes, possibly through a timer or remote network activity. + A [=parallel queue=] named as <dfn>lock requests queue</dfn> is + used for queuing all requests. When <dfn>requestPointerLock()</dfn> + invoked, perform the following steps: Done -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/49#discussion_r1617758760 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/49/review/2083632278@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2024 18:54:33 UTC