Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Split implementor interest and implementation bugs from PR template (PR #215)

@annevk commented on this pull request.



> @@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
 Closes #????
 
 For normative changes, the following tasks have been completed:
-
+ * [ ] At least two implementers are interested (and none opposed):

If engines cannot come to agreement, that is what implementation-defined is for. Which if used to the extent you suggest is more indicative of failure of the standardization process than anything else.

A specification shouldn't discuss concrete implementations. That's not what it's for.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/clipboard-apis/pull/215#discussion_r1611334843
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/clipboard-apis/pull/215/review/2073394697@github.com>