- From: Vincent Scheib <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 14:50:54 -0700
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 17 May 2024 21:50:58 UTC
My opinion is no, lock should not be exited due to a new request that can not be satisfied. E.g. Attempting an upgrade from a default request to a request with unadjusted movement that can not be satisfied should not cause the earlier lock to be exited. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/91#issuecomment-2118422661 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/issues/91/2118422661@github.com>
Received on Friday, 17 May 2024 21:50:58 UTC