- From: James Howard <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 11:32:09 -0700
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/49/review/2050625175@github.com>
@james-howard commented on this pull request. I added one small grammar comment, but otherwise looks good to me. > - This prevents locking upon initial navigation or re-acquiring lock - without user's attention. - </p> - <p> - A {{requestPointerLock()}} call immediately after the <a>default - unlock gesture</a> MUST fail even when <a>transient activation</a> - is available, to prevent malicious sites from acquiring an - unescapable locked state through repeated lock attempts. On the - other hand, a {{requestPointerLock()}} call immediately after a - programmatic lock exit (through a {{Document/exitPointerLock()}} - call) MUST succeed when <a>transient activation</a> is available, - to enable applications to move frequently between interaction - modes, possibly through a timer or remote network activity. + A [=parallel queue=] named as <dfn>lock requests queue</dfn> is + used for queuing all requests. When <dfn>requestPointerLock()</dfn> + invoked, perform the following steps: *is* invoked -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/49#pullrequestreview-2050625175 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/49/review/2050625175@github.com>
Received on Friday, 10 May 2024 18:32:13 UTC