- From: James Howard <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 11:32:09 -0700
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/49/review/2050625175@github.com>
@james-howard commented on this pull request.
I added one small grammar comment, but otherwise looks good to me.
> - This prevents locking upon initial navigation or re-acquiring lock
- without user's attention.
- </p>
- <p>
- A {{requestPointerLock()}} call immediately after the <a>default
- unlock gesture</a> MUST fail even when <a>transient activation</a>
- is available, to prevent malicious sites from acquiring an
- unescapable locked state through repeated lock attempts. On the
- other hand, a {{requestPointerLock()}} call immediately after a
- programmatic lock exit (through a {{Document/exitPointerLock()}}
- call) MUST succeed when <a>transient activation</a> is available,
- to enable applications to move frequently between interaction
- modes, possibly through a timer or remote network activity.
+ A [=parallel queue=] named as <dfn>lock requests queue</dfn> is
+ used for queuing all requests. When <dfn>requestPointerLock()</dfn>
+ invoked, perform the following steps:
*is* invoked
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/49#pullrequestreview-2050625175
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/49/review/2050625175@github.com>
Received on Friday, 10 May 2024 18:32:13 UTC