Re: [whatwg/webidl] Add `async iterable<T>` type to WebIDL (PR #1397)

Folks, could you take another look? I have clarified the allowed positions for async iterables (namely not in attributes), and have added guidance that:
a) async iterable IDL values can not be constructed in IDL, and always must come from language bindings
b) that spec authors should generally return an interface with an async iterable declaration, not an async iterable IDL value

@annevk has confirmed implementer interest for WebKit on Matrix - is anyone else in favor, or opposed?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1397#issuecomment-2098387465
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1397/c2098387465@github.com>