Re: [whatwg/webidl] Add `async iterable<T>` type to WebIDL (PR #1397)

Thanks for the quick response. I'm unsure whether we should think of `new Response(asyncIterable)` as a "coercion method", but I lean toward yes... and those are our two use cases so far, so, I'm unsure where that leaves us for the general Web IDL type.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1397#issuecomment-2021808733
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1397/c2021808733@github.com>