Re: [whatwg/webidl] Add `async iterable<T>` type to WebIDL (PR #1397)

Do we have Web IDL tests in WPT? I don't think so, right? I guess no tests specifically for this are relevant.

Considering this is mostly an editorial refactor, do we even need "implementer interest"? There is nothing to implement until an upstream spec uses this. I'll ask for support anyway though:

- @annevk You already expressed support on this design, can I take that as interest from WebKit?
- @saschanaz What are your thoughts? Does Mozilla have an opinion?
- For Chrome, maybe @domenic could chime in?
- Deno is interested in this.
- Node.js likely is too, considering that this unlocks `new Response(asyncIterable)`. @matteocollina can you comment?

Also @jasnell, any thoughts?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1397#issuecomment-2020845467
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1397/c2020845467@github.com>