Re: [whatwg/webidl] Add `async iterable<T>` type to WebIDL (PR #1397)

@MattiasBuelens I was not aware of this behaviour in Streams. I think we should stick with the behaviour where `async iterator<T>` must be an object in this PR (mirroring `sequence<T>`). Overload resolution becomes tricky and rather confusing otherwise.

Let's discuss whether to accept or error on `DOMString` arguments in the `ReadableStream.from()` PR.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1397#issuecomment-2020386670
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1397/c2020386670@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2024 13:08:24 UTC