- From: Mattias Buelens <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 03:06:24 -0700
- To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2024 10:06:28 UTC
> 3\. As with `sequence<T>`, primitives like strings, even if they have `@@iterator` on their prototype, are not considered for `async iterator<T>` overloads, and are also not valid `async iterator<T>` values. `async iterator<T>` requires values are `Type(V) == Object`, in addition to having either `@@iterator` or `@@asyncIterator`. This would technically be a breaking change for `ReadableStream.from()`, since we currently do accept strings (see [this test](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/3fd901dba4d461afda4cf9b692f8bd99fb05f4e1/streams/readable-streams/from.any.js#L21-L24)). That said, I wrote that test more as a sanity check, so I don't expect much usage in the wild. We can consider making `ReadableStream.from()` throw on strings, or we could change its signature to accept `async iterable<any> or string` instead. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1397#issuecomment-2020010833 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1397/c2020010833@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2024 10:06:28 UTC