- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:22:58 -0700
- To: w3c/selection-api <selection-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/selection-api/pull/172/review/1939661009@github.com>
@annevk commented on this pull request. > @@ -180,6 +180,10 @@ <h2> in the [=document tree=]. It could be in a [=shadow tree=] of the same [=document=]. </p> + <p> + Each <a>document</a>, <a>input</a> element, and <a>textarea</a> element has a boolean flag + <dfn>has scheduled selectionchange event</dfn>, which is initially false. I'd remove "flag" here. It's redundant with boolean and we stopped using flag in favor of boolean elsewhere. > </p> + <section> + <h4>Scheduling <code>selectionhange</code> event</h4> + <p>To <dfn>schedule a selectionchange event</dfn> on a node <var>target</var>, run these steps:</p> + <ol> + <li> + If <var>target</var>'s <a>has scheduled selectionchange event</a> flag is true, + abort these steps. + </li> + <li> + <a>Queue a task</a> on the <a>user interaction task source</a> to Instead of queue a task, you want https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#queue-an-element-task and also pass that _target_. This way some aspects of the task get better initialized. (We want to eventually remove "queue a task".) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/selection-api/pull/172#pullrequestreview-1939661009 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/selection-api/pull/172/review/1939661009@github.com>
Received on Friday, 15 March 2024 17:23:02 UTC