- From: Mayank <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:23:12 -0700
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/909/1995274290@github.com>
@matthewp > @knowler's approach is a push syntax isn't it? That example looks like push but it can be made pull-like with some intention. ```css @scope (:root, .pull-into-shadow:shadowroot) ``` ```html <body class="pull-into-shadow"><body> <my-element class="pull-into-shadow"></my-element> <div class="pull-into-shadow"></div> ``` The key difference is that this convention is defined by the page author, so it's not suitable for component authors. Maybe not a problem, since DSD itself is the page author's responsibility. > If all global .css files needed that wrapper it would be a bummer I agree. It would be nice if this could be done for whole stylesheets from the outside. ```css @import "styles.css" scope(:root, .pull-into-shadow:shadowroot) ``` Fwiw [media queries can already do this](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@import#importing_css_rules_conditional_on_media_queries). It looks like this using @bkardell's [`half-light`](https://bkardell.com/blog/half-light.html) convention: ```css @import "styles.css" media(screen, --crossroot); ``` …which makes me think maybe `@scope` is maybe not the best way to do this? Not without multiple new syntaxes at least. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/909#issuecomment-1995274290 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/909/1995274290@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2024 18:23:16 UTC