Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: make prepend more clearly operate on a list (PR #328) from Henri Sivonen on 2024-03-11 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from March 2024)

From: Henri Sivonen <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:47:09 -0700
To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/encoding/pull/328/c1988617148@github.com>

r+, but it would be worth considering if it should be called "restore" or "unread" to make the point that "prepend" is only ever used to put bytes back as if they hadn't been read and is never about any kind of other operation.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/pull/328#issuecomment-1988617148
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/encoding/pull/328/c1988617148@github.com>

Received on Monday, 11 March 2024 14:47:13 UTC