- From: Daniel Appelquist <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 03:39:52 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 11 March 2024 10:39:56 UTC
Hi @Djuffin My apologies it's taken us so long to get back to you on this. I realize things may have moved on significantly since you filed this review. We *did* have a fairly detailed discussion on this review [in October](https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/blob/gh-pages/2023/telcons/10-16-minutes.md#allow-transferring-arraybuffer-into-webcodecs-object-constructors) but unfortunately the output didn't make its way into this issue. Specifically you've asked "Should we just use a boolean value instead of a transfer list to indicate transferring of the ArrayBuffer contents to a WebCodecs object". In the absence of our feedback have you made any decision in the group thus-far on this? In any case, we don't see any issues and we're happy with the multi-stakeholder story here. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/889#issuecomment-1988124384 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/889/1988124384@github.com>
Received on Monday, 11 March 2024 10:39:56 UTC