Though we cannot share the exact feedback from the origin trial due to confidentiality, the feedback was quite positive with all respondents extremely likely to continue using the API. None of the respondents found the API hard to use, but we received some minor feedback on the API shape and feature requests that we have adopted or at least filed issues for.
Please see below for aggregated and manually vetted OT feedback that was shared as per Google's policy:
* 100% of the respondents are extremely likely to continue using the API.
* 43% of the respondents found the API 'Extremely easy'
* 43% found it 'Neither easy nor difficult'
* 14% found it 'Moderately easy' to use.
* 7% of the respondents mentioned that they would prefer to give the callback frequency in time units (secs, milliseconds), similar to other APIs such as setInterval in place of Hz as currently designed. A number scale along with labels would be more useful e.g. { pressure: 2, label: 'nominal' }.
* 2% of the respondents suggested adjusting thresholds or combining states to reduce "flapping" between fair and nominal
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/795#issuecomment-1982796332
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/795/1982796332@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2024 07:49:14 UTC