Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Updated review of WebNN API (Issue #933)

  Hi - thanks again for bringing this to us. We appreciate that you've been responsive to our feedback. We still have some concerns, but considering the current status of the work, we are planning to close the current review with a 'satisfied with concerns' label.
    
  Our main concern is: has this API considered the full range of hardware that it might need to run on?  We see this running on CPUs without neural processing extensions, GPUs without extensions, CPUs with extensions, GPUs with extensions, and dedicated ML hardware.  What steps have you taken to ensure that this runs across all of these targets, considering the range of hardware that exists and might exist?
  
  Our second and related concern is about multi-implementer support.  If this is going to be ubiquitous as an approach to "do NN on the web" then it really needs to be implemented across different platforms and different hardware.
  
  We encourage you to consider these issues as the spec and technology continues to evolve.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/933#issuecomment-2192643962
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/933/2192643962@github.com>