Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Timing Info for ServiceWorker static routing API (Issue #958)

Hi @quasi-mod  - thanks for sending us this. One thing that came up immediately in our initial discussion was the lack of a security & privacy discussion in the explainer ([info on writing explainers](https://tag.w3.org/explainers/)).  It seems that since this is dealing with timing, there might be some additional security issues that need to be explored or discussed beyond what was done already for Static Routing API.  This is probably fine, but anything that touches timing carries some risk, particularly when it touches on resources that might be shared, like caches. 
  
We're continuing to discuss and will provide additional feedback.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/958#issuecomment-2178002012
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/958/2178002012@github.com>