[w3c/pointerlock] Include `pointermove` when talking about `movementX/Y` (PR #101)

There are three more mention in this part of `mousemove`, should I change them to "`mousemove` and `pointermove`" on every occasion here? I feel like there should be a better solution here.

Fixes #100.


<!--
    This comment and the below content is programmatically generated.
    You may add a comma-separated list of anchors you'd like a
    direct link to below (e.g. #idl-serializers, #idl-sequence):

    Don't remove this comment or modify anything below this line.
    If you don't want a preview generated for this pull request,
    just replace the whole of this comment's content by "no preview"
    and remove what's below.
-->
***
<a href="https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/daxpedda/pointerlock/pull/101.html" title="Last updated on Jul 7, 2024, 4:22 PM UTC (01afb68)">Preview</a> | <a href="https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/pointerlock/101/0e99fcf...daxpedda:01afb68.html" title="Last updated on Jul 7, 2024, 4:22 PM UTC (01afb68)">Diff</a>
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/101

-- Commit Summary --

  * Include `pointermove` when talking about `movementX/Y`

-- File Changes --

    M index.html (6)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/101.patch
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/101.diff

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/101
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/pull/101@github.com>