Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG review for web app `scope_extensions` (Issue #875)

I'm flexible on:
* Using `type` vs. bag of parameters. `type` seems easier for developers to interpret, but bag of parameters could also be specified strictly to the same effect (where developers don't have to guess which params are compatible.)
* Starting with a scope suffix per site/origin object if this is sufficient to address concerns. Applying a `scope` to multiple origins that pass the same-site test places restrictions on the developer as the `scope` needs to make sense for all origins that pass the same-site test with their desired site. 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/875#issuecomment-2204493534
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/875/2204493534@github.com>