- From: Dominic Farolino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:20:54 -0800
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2024 20:21:01 UTC
> I think what I dislike about the current model is that insertion is not atomic from the perspective of script. Can you clarify exactly what you mean? Outside of a few implementation bugs mentioned above, it seems the spec is pretty clear that insertion/removal _should_ be atomic from the perspective of script, since I don't think any overridden insertion / removal steps synchronously invoke script, right? > If it works for everyone though we should add the various scenarios mentioned here and related issues to WPT and call it a day. Regardless, yes I agree, I'll get a PR up for adding these scenarios as WPTs and continue the discussion here if anything interesting arises. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/808#issuecomment-1917825588 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/808/1917825588@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2024 20:21:01 UTC