- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 20:50:40 -0800
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2024 04:50:46 UTC
I guess the opposite is worth considering: would a "no-isolate" put a user agent in a situation where they might end up having to implement that for compat reasons, where right now we live is a world where there is no expectation that an app will or won't be isolated. And, to frame this differently, what's the value that users get from "no-isolate" that would motivate a user agent to support that? In the above, you mentioned that "we know that isolation can break some apps if they depend on interaction with other origins." That's going to be the case regardless on MacOS/Safari, right? So I wonder if we should address that problem instead, which would solve that for everyone? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/1109#issuecomment-1897792368 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/manifest/issues/1109/1897792368@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2024 04:50:46 UTC