Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Specification review for fenced frames (Issue #838)

Hi @shivanigithub thanks for getting back so quickly.

When beginning our re-review of this earlier we found [references to exfiltration budget in the specification itself](https://wicg.github.io/fenced-frame/#fencedframetype-exfiltration-budget-metadata). We didn't recall this concept from our review in #735.

The [use cases](https://github.com/WICG/fenced-frame/blob/master/explainer/use_cases.md) we see in the explainer are not from a user needs perspective as far as we can tell. We'd appreciate a perspective on how these features impact end users, developers, and other parties who may be involved (eg. advertisers). What are the problems each set of users is facing? How do the proposed features solve them? What trade-offs are there?

The questions in [this comment we left in July](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/838#issuecomment-1630215214) still stand as far as I can tell.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/838#issuecomment-1892661808
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/838/1892661808@github.com>