- From: vmpstr <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:56:09 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2024 18:56:13 UTC
> @vmpstr am I to infer that you no longer intend to include the `<html blocking=""` attribute? I can't see how an HTML document without any body content could end up being unblocked anyway, so that seemed like it was redundant. Yes, that's correct. We are only planning to support a single way to enable this, namely the section to which I linked above. As for `link` vs another tag name, @noamr is right that we seem to have pretty good consensus with a bunch of that discussion happening on the issue. That being said, I don't feel too strongly about a possibility of a different name here, so it may be a worthwhile point to raise. Is there a specific objection to `link`? FWIW, I also agree with @noamr that I prefer we take the conversation to the linked issue to make sure the discussion is visible to other participants there -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/886#issuecomment-1954867672 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/886/1954867672@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2024 18:56:13 UTC