Re: [w3c/uievents] Consider splitting the spec into smaller specifications (Issue #369)

Also, as always, I want to reiterate that reaching REC should be an anti-goal. Fundamental parts of the platform like this need to stay as living specs; we can't ever assume they're finished, and consign them to dead specs (RECs). If part of the motivation for the split here is process-related, I'd suggest setting that aside and instead focusing on the technically-best outcome. (Which, IMO, is somewhere between a merger with HTML and a monolithic UI Events spec. But, it's ultimately the editor's judgement, not mine.)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/uievents/issues/369#issuecomment-1931129650
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/uievents/issues/369/1931129650@github.com>