- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 16:16:37 -0700
- To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2024 23:16:41 UTC
Seems fine directionally. In general we want `DOMException` to behave as if its constructor had a `super()` call and I think this aligns with that. Editorially I wonder if putting it as a step in https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#internally-create-a-new-object-implementing-the-interface would be better. (E.g. modifying step 4.) I also don't understand the relationship to #732 (serializability). -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1421#issuecomment-2313738853 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1421/c2313738853@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2024 23:16:41 UTC