Re: [whatwg/webidl] Add `async iterable<T>` type to WebIDL (PR #1397)

Copying over [a thought](https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1291#issuecomment-2309803657) from @annevk:

> Treating string objects and values in the same way whenever possible seems preferable. Which argues for 1 as otherwise each API would have to deal with this anew.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1397#issuecomment-2309874588
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1397/c2309874588@github.com>

Received on Monday, 26 August 2024 10:25:38 UTC