Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG review for web app `scope_extensions` (Issue #875)

Thank you to all who gave feedback at the breakout session.

I'm pleaseed we were able to address concerns about storage/cookies/permissions/preferences remaining separate by origin. We can and will call that out more clearly in the explainer. 

We will also look into whether the information conveyed through the existing manifest field + web app origin association file can be expressed using feature-restricted [URLPattern](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/URLPattern). 

We will do some research on CORS extensions and reply with pros and cons of using this instead of web app origin association. [Associated Website Sets](https://github.com/WICG/first-party-sets) is unsuitable as it operates on full domains instead of origins and does not have the primitives to select between different web app IDs on the same domain for association.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/875#issuecomment-2059867338
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/875/2059867338@github.com>