- From: Dominic Farolino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:13:29 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1261/review/2001073351@github.com>
@domfarolino commented on this pull request. > @@ -2752,6 +2810,16 @@ before a <var>child</var>, with an optional <i>suppress observers flag</i>, run <var>parent</var> with <var>nodes</var>, « », <var>previousSibling</var>, and <var>child</var>. <li><p>Run the <a>children changed steps</a> for <var>parent</var>. + + <li> + <p>For each <var>node</var> in <var>nodes</var>, in <a>tree order</a>: + + <ol> + <li><p>For each <a>shadow-including inclusive descendant</a> <var>inclusiveDescendant</var> of + <var>node</var>, in <a>shadow-including tree order</a>, run the <a>post-insertion steps</a> with + <var>inclusiveDescendant</var>. + </ol> + </li> The queue mechanism here and the one in Blink have no observable differences. In Blink, all elements with post-insertion steps end up in that queue of nodes to get their steps run. In this PR, all elements with post-insertion steps also run after insertion. Should be no behavioral difference. I can’t speak to script runners at all since there is no proposal for them, and I don’t really understand them. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1261#discussion_r1565773915 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1261/review/2001073351@github.com>
Received on Monday, 15 April 2024 13:13:33 UTC