Re: [whatwg/dom] Introduce DOM post-insertion steps (PR #1261)

@noamr commented on this pull request.



> @@ -2752,6 +2812,16 @@ before a <var>child</var>, with an optional <i>suppress observers flag</i>, run
  <var>parent</var> with <var>nodes</var>, « », <var>previousSibling</var>, and <var>child</var>.
 
  <li><p>Run the <a>children changed steps</a> for <var>parent</var>.
+
+ <li>
+  <p>For each <var>node</var> in <var>nodes</var>, in <a>tree order</a>:
+
+  <ol>
+   <li><p>For each <a>shadow-including inclusive descendant</a> <var>inclusiveDescendant</var> of
+   <var>node</var>, in <a>shadow-including tree order</a>, run the <a>post-insertion steps</a> with
+   <var>inclusiveDescendant</var>.
+  </ol>
+ </li>

Given that we don't often add new post-insertion steps/script runners, and the fact that there aren't that many of those today, is there an observable difference between that and post-insertion steps? To me it doesn't seem material whether we spec it this way or that way, it's a way to express that iframes & scripts never run scriptable side-effects in the middle of the DOM update.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1261#discussion_r1559370128
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1261/review/1991588270@github.com>