Re: [WICG/webcomponents] "open-stylable" Shadow Roots (#909)

> In general, I think it would be helpful to keep proof-of-concept specific syntax out of this thread as it’s too hard to keep track of all of the proposed syntaxes as well as the proof of concept syntaxes.

I updated the shadow layers [proposal](https://github.com/htmlcomponents/shadow-layers) to put both functionality and syntax in the broader context of:

- proposed specification language
- proposed CSS working group resolution

See [Add an adoptStyles capability in shadowRoots (WICG 909: open-stylable Shadow Roots) #10176](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10176).

**Table of Contents**

- Background
  - Bringing Page Styles into Shadow Trees
  - New Tools, New Solutions
  - Declarative Shadow DOM
  - Cascade Layers
- Proposal
  - DOM Interface ShadowRoot
  - CSS Cascading and Inheritance Context
  - Declarative Parse Locations
- Rationale
- Web Platform Tests \& User Stories
- Potential Extensions
- Polyfill
- Conclusion \& Proposed CSS Working Group Resolution

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/909#issuecomment-2038265650
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/909/2038265650@github.com>