- From: Luke Warlow <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 07:26:32 -0700
- To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2024 14:26:35 UTC
@lukewarlow commented on this pull request. > @@ -11056,6 +11091,21 @@ allowed. The security check takes the following three inputs: Note: The HTML Standard defines how a security check is performed. [[!HTML]] +Certain algorithms are defined to +<dfn id="dfn-validate-the-string-in-context" export>validate the string in context</dfn> on a given +value. This check is used to determine whether a given value +is appropriate for its {{StringContext}}. This validation takes the following four inputs: + +1. the [=platform object=] on + which the operation invocation or attribute access is being done, +1. the value to validate, +1. the {{StringContext}} [=identifier=], and +1. the [=identifier=] of the operation or attribute. + +The algorithm returns an ECMAScript value, or [=JavaScript/throws=] a <l spec=ecmascript>{{TypeError}}</l>. + +Note: The HTML Standard defines how the validation is performed. [[!HTML]] After discussion in the matrix I'm on board with the idea of just using union types and updating algorithms, and closing this PR out -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1392#discussion_r1551791154 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1392/review/1980086689@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2024 14:26:35 UTC