- From: Peter Van der Beken <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:45:25 -0700
- To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1392/review/1979626728@github.com>
@petervanderbeken commented on this pull request. > +If the [{{StringContext}}] [=extended attribute=] appears on {{DOMString}} or {{USVString}}, it +modifies how the value is converted to the IDL type, causing additional value validation to +adhere to the context the string is used in. + +The [{{StringContext}}] extended attribute must [=takes an identifier|take an identifier=]. The [=identifier=] +must be one of "<code>TrustedHTML</code>", "<code>TrustedScript</code>", and "<code>TrustedScriptURL</code>". + +The [{{StringContext}}] extended attribute may only annotate a type of a [=regular attribute=] or +a [=regular operation=] argument. A type annotated with the [{{StringContext}}] +extended attribute must not appear in a [=read only=] attribute. + +A type that is not {{DOMString}} or {{USVString}} must not be [=extended attributes associated with|associated with=] +the [{{StringContext}}] extended attribute. + +The [{{StringContext}}] extended attribute must not be used on only some of the [=overloaded|overloads=] of an +[=overloaded=] [=operation=]. I find this sentence a bit weird, because it's used on arguments, not on the operation itself. Does this mean that in the case of overloads, either all `DOMString`/`USVString` arguments need to be annotated or none? Or just that if the overloads have a `DOMString`/`USVString` argument in the same position it should be annotated the same way in all overloads? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1392#pullrequestreview-1979626728 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1392/review/1979626728@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2024 11:45:29 UTC