Re: [whatwg/webidl] Add distinguishable state for cb and dictionary-like (PR #1353)

> Looks good with a wording nit.
> 
> Can we get multi-implementer interest here somehow? In particular, making sure this doesn't break something deep in their binding system, for example.
> 
> If the API you intend to use this for has multi-implementer interest, then recruiting those people to come over here and say "yes, no problem with changing Web IDL to accommodate that API" would be perfect.

FWIW, I've implemented [the corresponding change](https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4978263) in Chromium. It's already been landed.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/pull/1353#issuecomment-1782331364
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/pull/1353/c1782331364@github.com>

Received on Friday, 27 October 2023 05:45:52 UTC