[w3ctag/design-reviews] Long Animation Frame API (LoAF) (Issue #911)

こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting a TAG review of Long Animation Frame API.

LoAF an API that lets a webpage measure long periods of time where the main thread was busy/congested, resulting in
sluggishness. It also adds information that helps understand what caused that busy period and act on it. 

  - Explainer: https://github.com/w3c/longtasks/blob/main/loaf-explainer.md
  - User research: [url to public summary/results of research]
  - Security and Privacy self-review²: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rsaghOOGlTKyzFHR9d_cIRLpZoik3O_S2yYh_oq_jAM/edit?usp=sharing
  - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/longtaskד
  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
      - Noam Rosenthal (@noamr), Google
      - Yoav Weiss (@yoavweiss), Google, Group chair
      - Michal Mocny (@mmocny), Google 
  - Organization/project driving the design: Google
  - External status/issue trackers for this feature (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): https://chromestatus.com/feature/6118675067699200

Further details:

  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/)
  - The group where the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future): WebPerfWG
  - The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done ("unknown" if not known): WebPerfWG
  - Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this design: TBD
  - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: Not yet...
  - This work is being funded by: Google

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

💬 leave review feedback as a **comment in this issue** and @-notify @noamr



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/911
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/911@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2023 16:45:57 UTC