- From: Zamralik <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:37:56 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 13 October 2023 20:38:01 UTC
> > At the very least, the standard should add new alternative standard verbs that are similar to GET and HEAD in meaning, but support having a body. > > Including a body in a GET request, is already supported in the standard Indeed it is, but the whatwg seems hellbent in stubornly rejecting that standard use because it could mess up with legacy code that assume otherwise. Hence why the least would be to do the same thing that was done with HTTP, when codes 307/308 were added as alternative to 301/302. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/551#issuecomment-1762168176 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/551/1762168176@github.com>
Received on Friday, 13 October 2023 20:38:01 UTC