- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 13:01:02 -0700
- To: w3c/clipboard-apis <clipboard-apis@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 9 October 2023 20:01:08 UTC
I don't have strong feelings here, but my intuition for how developers would try to use supports() for custom types in practice is either: * `ClipboardItem.supports('web valid/type');` // where we'd return true for 'web' + space prefix and valid mime type suffix suffix * `ClipboardItem.supports('web');` // true The former aligns with the concept of supports() being a way of testing what the ClipboardItem constructor would do without wasting time, but accepting 'web' on its own seems like a nice to have. 'web ' (web + space, with no suffix) on its own isn't accepted by https://w3c.github.io/clipboard-apis/#dom-clipboarditem-clipboarditem so far as I can tell (maybe I'm wrong?), and it's not intuitive to me that a developer would try it. But maybe I'm missing the point of the discussion. What are the alternatives we're considering? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/clipboard-apis/pull/192#issuecomment-1753661815 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/clipboard-apis/pull/192/c1753661815@github.com>
Received on Monday, 9 October 2023 20:01:08 UTC