- From: Antonio Sartori <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 23:29:14 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 2 October 2023 06:29:19 UTC
Makes all sense to me. For CSP: For 3. I already have a draft PR to fix the headings problems in https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp/pull/621. For 1. I think it would make sense for me to update that draft removing all the "should"s. For 2., I was already struggling before. The wording 'if the result of **determining whether response should be blocked by Content Security Policy** given *response* is "Allowed"' sounds overly elaborate. If we change the result types into **true** or **false** from infra, could we just call 'if *response* is **blocked by Content Security Policy**'? And define something like ``` To determine whether a [=response=] is <dfn for=response export>blocked by Content Security Policy</dfn> execute the following steps: ... ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1714#issuecomment-1742461555 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/1714/1742461555@github.com>
Received on Monday, 2 October 2023 06:29:19 UTC